State Headlines From Wisconsin Public Radio, June 3 | Ashland Current

State Headlines From Wisconsin Public Radio, June 3 | Ashland Current

Future public safety workers can expect to pay more for benefits By Shawn Johnson, Wisconsin Public Radio

Newly hired police and firefighters would be forced to pay more for their health care and pension benefits under a plan approved by Republicans on the legislature's budget committee. Police and firefighters were specifically exempt from the collective bargaining changes Republicans made earlier this year. But under the plan Republicans on the budget committee passed, new hires would be forced to pay more for their health care and pensions and so would police or firefighters who leave one agency to work for another.

Assembly Democrat Jennifer Shilling called the move significant. She says, "the lessons that I learned tonight from this is there is no one that is safe for long."

But Republican Assembly Co-Chair Robin Vos stressed that it would not apply to police and firefighters who are already on the job. He says, "people who are existing would be under one set of rules. People who are brand new hires who take the job understanding exactly what their circumstances are would get a new set of rules."

But another change Republicans passed would apply to all police and firefighters. They would no longer be allowed to bargain over the design and choice of their health insurance plans.

Protesters flood Joint Finance Committee meeting By Shawn Johnson, Wisconsin Public Radio

Police carried protesters out of the legislature's Joint Finance Committee meeting Thursday night as dozens disrupted the panel's work on the next two-year state budget. One protester after another stood up last night, proceeded to the center of the room in front of the committee and started talking over the committee, with some reading from the Constitution and some taking shots at Republicans.

One after another they were led away by police. One protester who was lead away said, "you justify your actions claiming immigrant children are taking away resources. Alright, I'm not resisting, but go ahead and take me out. I'm just dissenting. Just dissenting."

Early on, it was Democrats who tried to calm the crowd, including La Crosse Rep. Jennifer Shilling. The suggestions were not well-received. For more than a half hour, the committee proceeded that way.

Republican Assembly Committee Co-Chair Robin Vos never took a break, even as other lawmakers couldn't hear what he was saying. As the crowd chanted "Whose house? Our house!, Vos said, "We're not going to let the crowd just come in here and march in and decide to shout us out. We're not going to let the crowd shout us down, so we're going to do our job today."

Capitol police say 25 to 30 people were led out of the building and there were two arrests. Protesters will likely return Friday as the Joint Finance Committee wraps up its work on the two year budget.

Some money restored for recycling By Shawn Johnson, Wisconsin Public Radio

The legislature's budget committee has voted to restore some of the funding for Wisconsin's recycling program. The governor proposed eliminating state funding and the state mandate for the $32-a-year program. The budget committee voted to restore $19 million of that.

Marinette Assembly Republican John Nygren said people have come to expect recycling. He says, "it's my belief when you deal with the recycling program that society has changed. I remember when it first started years ago, I wasn't too keen on it. It seemed like a hassle, I'm sure a lot of people thought same thing, a little bit of a hassle. But we've changed over the years. We've become accustomed to it. It's the way we operate our families."

The committee also voted to continue using revenue from the state's tipping fee on garbage to pay for recycling among other environmental programs. The governor wanted to use the fund to pay for economic development.

Democratic Party meets this weekend By Chuck Quirmbach, Wisconsin Public Radio

State Democrats are promising a lot of enthusiasm at their annual political convention in Milwaukee beginning Friday night. But, the party also has plenty of unanswered questions.

The Wisconsin Democratic Party says about 1,600 people will be at the two-day convention. State party chairman Mike Tate says Gov. Walker's attack on collective bargaining, and Congressman Paul Ryan's plan to create Medicare vouchers have Democrats fired up. But some of the Republican state Senators fighting off recall elections have been raising sizable amounts of money. Tate contends the Democratic challengers will have financial support.

Democrats also have a big question mark as to who will run to replace the retiring Herb Kohl as U.S. Senator. Former Sen. Russ Feingold says he'll decide by Labor Day. Mike Tate says the matter probably won't be settled at this weekend's convention.

Tate says there may eventually be a Democratic primary for Senate. One other question for the convention will be what New York Rep. Anthony Weiner will say when he speaks Friday night. Weiner's been in the news because of a lewd photo on his Twitter feed. Mike Tate says Weiner's account was hacked. If Weiner goes ahead with his speech, it's one of several at the convention that may make national news.

Schools may be given more time to remove race-based mascots By Brian Bull, Wisconsin Public Radio

Schools ordered to eliminate race-based mascots would have until late next year to do so, under a bill being introduced in the legislature.

State Sen. Mary Lazich says her bill would alleviate the financial burden to such schools, by giving them until November 2012 to comply with the state's mascot law. The New Berlin Republican says currently in her district, Mukwonago School officials have until this October to get rid of their "Indians" mascot.

Lazich says that may cost them between $30,000 and $50,000. She says, "they need the dollars for education. So to force them to change a mascot which they've had for years and years and years and years, and to put a burden of proof on them, that they are guilty of some dastardly deed, is very contrary to our judicial system."

Lazich says it will also buy time for further challenges to the mascot law, which went into effect last year. A legal hearing is being held next month in Waukesha County, on a lawsuit questioning the law's constitutionality. And Whitewater Rep. Steve Nass has a bill aimed at repealing the law, though it remains stuck in the Homeland Security Committee.

If Lazich's bill is enacted, it would apply to any school district previously ordered by the Department of Public Instruction to eliminate its mascot. The first complaint under the law was filed against Osseo-Fairchild, which has until the end of July to comply with the DPI's order and remove its "Chieftains" mascot.

Supporters of the law say race-based mascots are discriminatory, promote racial stereotypes, and hurt the well-being of Native American students.

Hearing held on proposed "castle" law By Shamane Mills, Wisconsin Public Radio

The National Rifle Association asserts there won't be problems if Wisconsin expands the right of homeowners to protect against intruders. And the group has asked for a 'presumption of self defense' to extend outside the walls of someone's home.

The idea that a person's home is their castle has given rise to laws around the country allowing deadly force against intruders. Wisconsin is considering such a proposal. It would also protect shooters from civil lawsuits by the victim or their family. In the second legislative hearing on the bill, the NRA asked for amendments. Spokesman Darren La Sorte says a person should be able to protect themselves if they shoot an intruder in other places than just their home: for instance, their car. He says, "if someone's unlawfully entering, a vehicle you'd be able to be able to be covered by this presumption (of self defense) so carjacking, kidnapping from a vehicle."

During the hearing, Democrat Fred Risser brought up situations where a homeowner might use deadly force against someone they didn't intend to. One of the bill's authors, Racine Sen. Van Wangaard, says having a judge presume self defense allows homeowners to act in dangerous situations. He says this, "isn't groundbreaking legislation and isn't going to turn Wisconsin into the Wild West. This is a measured, balanced law that has proven successful in many other states."

The Wisconsin Association for Justice is against the bill. The state bar's criminal law division also opposes it.

Food Stamp recipients on the rise By Kristen Durst, Wisconsin Public Radio

The number of people on food stamps has grown in nearly every state in the nation in the past year, including Wisconsin. The Department of Agriculture says food stamp use nationwide was up 11 percent from March of 2010 to this past March. Wisconsin's increase was also 11 percent -- with more than 800,000 people in the state currently receiving assistance through the state's FoodShare program.

Sherrie Tussler is the executive director of Hunger Task Force in Milwaukee. She says, "the economy may be improving but I don't think it's touching everybody. There are still a lot of unemployed people. And a lot of people with disabilities who may never be able to work that rely on the FoodShare program in order to put food on the table."

In Wisconsin, more than 80,000 more people relied on food stamps this past year. 13.6 percent of Wisconsin residents currently receive food assistance.

Gas giveaway incentives may boost tourism By Brian Bull, Wisconsin Public Radio

Wisconsin's hotels and lodges want you to expand your summer travel plans, and many are even willing to help keep the tank full. Right now, gas prices are a $1.20 a gallon more than last year. The Wisconsin Hotel and Lodging Association wants to keep its members' rooms full this summer, so they're now offering gas cards to travelers to help ease the pain of higher fuel prices. The amounts mostly vary between $25 and $50, depending on the length of stay.

WH&LA president Trisha Pugal says so far, about 30 members are offering the gas cards, and expects that number to grow as the summer travel season heats up. Pugal hopes that the promotion will encourage travelers to expand their "staycation" plans just a bit further on the map, so her industry sees a more profitable year.

"Last year had a very modest growth, it was 1.8 percent or something like that from the previous year," says Pugal. "We're looking forward to this year moving much stronger, it's already showing some signs of growth and we're just again trying to make sure that travelers think about getting out and enjoying overnight stays obviously, and enjoying our state."

Deborah Mitchell is with the Center for Brand and Product Management at the Wisconsin School of Business, at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She says the gas card promotion works because it tackles travelers' fears over high gas prices head on.

"Psychologically, a dollar is not a dollar to consumers," says Mitchell. "And so rather than just giving people $20 or $30 or $50 which --it is money, but it can be spent on a lot of different things -- this is very clean. It says, `Hey! This can go for your gas.' And in our minds, we think, `Oh I know I need I'm going to have to spend a certain amount on gas,' --this activates --then takes off the table -- an argument and a concern for people in a very direct manner. It's brilliant."

The promotion period ends August 31. Specific details on the gas card getaway campaign can be found online at wisconsinlodging.org.

Wisconsin weighs apology law for medical providers By Shamane Mills, Wisconsin Public Radio

Many states have tried to reduce malpractice suits by allowing doctors to say they're sorry for medical errors. Wisconsin is considering a proposal that would do that and more: it would also exclude expressions of fault or responsibility from being used in civil suits.

In the 90s, "apology laws" emerged in the U.S. as a way to open up communication between doctor and patient and potentially head off liability lawsuits. Dr. Norman Jensen of the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics says potential court action scares doctors into silence, when oftentimes families just want to know what went wrong.

"Human beings--Americans for sure--have a lot of forgiveness in their hearts and souls if they're only treated with respect and openness," Jensen said.

This proposal is more expansive than one last session that was vetoed by then-Governor Jim Doyle. Milwaukee Rep. Jon Richards says most laws in the U.S. allow doctors to express regret or sympathy; Wisconsin's broader proposal could potentially make it harder to prove malpractice.

"Saying 'I'm sorry' is a good and appropriate thing to do," says Richards. "But this goes way beyond that. This goes into direct admission of fault and responsibility!"

Supporters of the bill say it will reduce frivolous lawsuits; a 2006 Harvard study found perception of them to be overblown. Such lawsuits are tough to win, says Mike End, an injury attorney and president of the Wisconsin Association of Justice. He favors doctor apologies, but not exclusion of fault or responsibility.

"Communication is the way to go, that's patient safety," says End. "But you don't need to potentially destroy the right of someone to be compensated."

Supporters of the bill say while a doctor's admission of fault to a patient would not be admissible in court, lawyers could still use medical records and other evidence to prove their case.

GAB argues for more time to review recall effort against three Dems By Shawn Johnson, Wisconsin Public Radio

The Government Accountability Board (GAB) has asked a circuit court judge for more time to complete its review of recall petitions against three Democratic state Senators.

In a motion filed with the court, GAB asked for an extra week to deal with the recall petitions against Democratic Senators Dave Hansen, Jim Holperin and Robert Wirch. The board says that challenges to their petitions raise issues that are more complex than those the board encountered in other recall efforts.

That's partly because the challenges to the recalls against Democrats allege circulators committed fraud, in some cases by forging signatures and in other cases by tricking people into signing the petitions. The challenges to these recalls included hundreds of signed affidavits from people who said they witnessed this first hand. The challenges allege that this fraud rose to such a level that the board has to throw out all the signatures these circulators gathered.

The board is asking the court to move its deadline for ruling on the petitions from this Friday to a week from Friday. Recall organizers have protested the move, saying it's biased against Republicans. The board has already approved recall petitions against six GOP Senators: Dan Kapanke, Randy Hopper, Luther Olsen, Sheila Harsdorf, Robert Cowles and Alberta Darling.

Milk prices are stable By Steve Roisum, Wisconsin Public Radio

Milk prices continue to stay strong in a year that was predicted to be a lot worse. Before the beginning of the year, industry experts predicted milk market prices could drop as low as $14 for every 100 pounds of milk, due mostly to overproduction and not enough demand.

But, prices have continued to stay high for Wisconsin farmers in 2011. In April, milk sold for an average of more than $19 for every 100 pounds of milk. A slight drop in price is predicted for May, but still above $19 per hundredweight. Dairy economist Bob Cropp says Wisconsin dairy products are in strong demand in, and out, of the U.S.

"Actually, we doubled our non-fat skim milk exports, butter exports almost doubled, cheese exports are up 85 percent. So that added strength to those product prices which has driven up the milk prices," Cropp said.

While the high milk market prices have been good news for farmers, the cost of cattle feed is at a near record high. But Cropp says milk market prices should still be high enough for many farmers to see some profit.

Joint finance votes to lower chewing tobacco tax By Shawn Johnson, Wisconsin Public Radio

Anti-smoking groups are attacking a vote by the legislature's budget committee that would lower taxes on premium brands of chewing tobacco. The plan would have the state begin taxing moist snuff based on its weight rather than on its price. Taxes on lower-priced bands of chew would actually go up.

Maureen Busalacchi with Health First Wisconsin says lawmakers were turning their backs on the health of kids with the vote.

"It concerns me because we've lowered the price of some of the premium products which are the products that kids are most likely to use," says Busalacchi. "And while the motion wasn't entirely bad because it did raise some prices on lower priced products, it's really not sending the right message."

The move was approved in a bipartisan 13-3 vote. The committee's vote comes weeks after it voted to cut the state's budget for its tobacco control program.

Man protests Chinese art exhibit By Chuck Quirmbach, Wisconsin Public Radio

A self-described "arts agitator" stood outside the Milwaukee Art Museum yesterday and partially shaved his head, to show solidarity with a detained Chinese artist. The museum is about to start a series of exhibitions of Chinese art, and the Chinese government is helping with one of the shows. Two months ago, Chinese officials detained one of that country's most famous artists Ai Wei Wei.

Former Milwaukee art gallery owner Mike Brenner tried to call attention to Wei Wei's plight by standing across the street from the museum and shaving a wedge of hair off the top of his head, to match Wei Wei's hairstyle. After finishing with the electric razor, Brenner talked about showing solidarity with Wei Wei. He says he'd like the Milwaukee museum to go ahead with the Chinese exhibition, but do a better job of acknowledging Wei Wei's detention.

Milwaukee Art Museum director Daniel Keegan says - in a written statement? that the museum's mission is to "serve the community and present art as a vital source of inspiration and education", and it is "committed to bring people together to inform, educate and engage in conversation around art."

Events held during the Summer of CHINA exhibitions will "provide historical context, explore important aspects of 3,000 years of Chinese culture, and deal with contemporary issues." One panel discussion on the politics of art will include Melissa Chiu, from the Asia Society and author Barbara Pollack.

Keegan adds that the Museum "does not support censorship - including self-censorship - of art exhibitions or artists based on unpopular or controversial subjects." A few weeks ago, the museum also released a statement sharing concern for Wei Wei's well-being.

Kloppenburg concedes in Supreme Court race By Shamane Mills, Wisconsin Public Radio

There will be no legal challenge of the state Supreme Court election recount. Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg conceded defeat to incumbent David Prosser this week.

A narrow election night win on April 5 turned into a loss for JoAnne Kloppenburg when Waukesha County belatedly reported thousands of votes from Brookfield. She requested a recount which David Prosser won by 7,000 votes, and which Kloppenburg will not challenge.

"It would serve no purpose to bring a suit with insufficient legal basis. That is not the kind of lawyer I am," Kloppenburg said.

Kloppenburg says the recount shows ballot security needs improvement. She credited hard working clerks and volunteers but said Election Night procedures are "uneven" across the hundreds of municipalities. She called on the Government Accountability Board to improve the security and transparency of Wisconsin elections.

Kloppenburg is also asking for the GAB to appoint an independent investigator in Waukesha County.

"Waukesha County has twice as many torn, open or unsealed bags as every other county in the state combined," she said.

The race for state Supreme Court is officially nonpartisan. However, it occurred during Gov. Walker's plan to take away nearly all collective bargaining rights for most state workers, adding a political overtone for those who supported or opposed the governor's plan. The state Supreme Court will hear arguments next week whether to take the case. Prosser will begin his next 10 year term in August.

Budget committee approves tax code changes By Shawn Johnson, Wisconsin Public Radio

The working poor could see their tax bills go up while investors and multi-state corporations could see their tax bills go down under measures approved yesterday by Republicans on the legislature's budget committee.

The proposal would scale back Wisconsin's Earned Income Tax Credit. It would mean a family with two kids who makes less than $46,000 could owe about $150 more on their taxes. A larger family with a combined income of up to $49,000 could see their tax bill go up by more than $500.

Democratic Rep. Jennifer Shilling called it a blatant tax increase and the wrong priority.

"This appears to be a tax increase on those who can least afford it," says Shilling.

Republicans on the committee also voted to defer Wisconsin Capital Gains tax for investors who reinvest their earnings in Wisconsin businesses. Investors who turn a profit after holding their money in a Wisconsin business would see their state capital gains tax eliminated.

Republican Senate co-chair Alberta Darling said that was a crucial component to creating jobs.

"It's especially important for companies in Wisconsin to have people from Wisconsin invest in them," Darling said.

Republicans also changed the state's combined reporting tax on multi-state corporations to lower their taxes by a $46-million over the next two years.

Changes coming to state's welfare program By Shawn Johnson, Wisconsin Public Radio

Republicans on the legislature's budget committee voted to undo several changes to Wisconsin's W2 program that were made during Governor Jim Doyle's administration.

GOP lawmakers voted to reinstate a two-year time limit on how long someone can participate in Wisconsin's welfare-to-work program, tighter than the federal limit of five years that Democrats voted to bring Wisconsin in line with last session. Republicans also voted to reduce the amount of time a mother of a newborn could stay home and still receive W2 benefits, from 12 weeks to eight.

The GOP also voted to let W2 providers deem certain applicants with some education and work history as "job ready," in essence saying they should be able to find work without W2's help.

Milwaukee Democrat Tamara Grigsby said she fought to end that category and it pained her to see it coming back. Grigsby said it was aimed at one thing--reducing W2 caseloads.

"Not eliminating poverty. Not putting people in good jobs. But just lowering our caseloads," Grigsby said.

The committee also voted to let a transitional jobs project continue in Wisconsin, but not for much longer. The project uses federal fund to subsidize minimum wage jobs for people who don't qualify for unemployment benefits. The governor would have gotten rid of the program. Republican lawmakers voted to scale it back and phase it out by mid-2012.

A closer look at where wolves are attacking cattle By Chuck Quirmbach, Wisconsin Public Radio

A new study gives a clearer look at where gray wolves are attacking livestock in Wisconsin. Researchers from the Department of Natural Resources and the University of Wisconsin-Madison looked at about 10 years of data. The study's key finding is that while gray wolves are found in much of the northern third of the state, only about 10 percent of Wisconsin in northwestern counties -- and a few pockets near Lake Superior -- have a high risk of the wolf attacks.

Adrian Treves heads the carnivore coexistence lab at the university. He says the finding should be good news for farmers, wildlife managers and policymakers. Treves says in the high risk areas, there's a "perfect storm" of a lot of pasture land, being about ten kilometers from wolf pack ranges and rather far from forests. He says data from the first years studied helped predict 88 percent of later incidents.

Farmers in the high risk areas may want to consider electric fences, and other means to deter wolves. The study comes as the federal government is proposing to take gray wolves in Wisconsin off the Endangered Species list, giving the state more control in managing the animals.

Venture capital legislation being reworked By Maureen McCollum, Wisconsin Public Radio

The governor's office is reworking a piece of legislation that could help start-up businesses. But not everyone is happy with how the money could be distributed. Venture capital is money invested into start up businesses that are deemed promising. It helps entrepreneurs who have ideas, but do not have money.

A bill establishing the Wisconsin Venture Capital Authority would oversee two funds for insurance and certified capital companies that want to invest in state businesses. The Badger Jobs Fund and Jobs Now Fund combined would award up to $400 million in bonds and tax credits to the investment companies.

While the bill's supporters say this will help create jobs, the bill has critics from both parties.

Republican Senator Dan Kapanke of La Crosse says venture capital is necessary to help start businesses, but thinks the bill should be reworked.

"I was concerned about the tax breaks going into the insurance companies and that the capital companies would be receiving the monies, and then they'd be able to retain 80-percent of the profits from that," says Kapanke. "So, we want to make sure if we craft a bill to grow jobs, that the intended purpose is met and that is that we are growing jobs and the money is used in the best possible manner."

Governor Scott Walker's spokesman, Cullen Werwie, wrote in an e-mail statement that the governor is working with the legislature to address concerns raised in the first version of the bill. He says they'll ensure that taxpayer funds are used effectively.

DPI: continuing revenue caps and latest budget will hurt state's educational standing By Brian Bull, Wisconsin Public Radio

The most recent Census data shows Wisconsin spending more per public school student than the national average. But a state education official says overall, Wisconsin's standing has fallen steadily, and will likely continue to do so.

On average, public schools nationwide spent $10,500 per student in 2009. Wisconsin spent $11,078, placing it roughly in the top third of states. However, John Johnson, Director of Education Services at the state Department of Public Instruction, says Wisconsin's ranking has been sliding since revenue control caps were enacted in the 1990s.

"We've had revenue caps for 18 years, schools have been cutting expenses and spending for 18 years," says Johnson. "When you look at these Census reports from 10 years before, Wisconsin was 12th in the nation, now Wisconsin is 19th in terms of revenue supporting students. Wisconsin is almost at the national average at this point, whereas Wisconsin was always considered a state that put a lot of resources into K-12 education."

On top of limits on how much revenue a district can raise on a per student basis, the legislature is now weighing a budget cut of nearly $800-million to education. Johnson says there's no way to predict how that'll affect per-student spending in Wisconsin, only that the revenue caps and cut will have a big impact.

"Less money for classrooms, and class sizes either go up, or different educational opportunities are shrunk such as art or music, or Advanced Placement classes, physical education classes. Those are the types of things school administrators said in a survey in the last month would be on a chopping block due to budget cuts," Johnson said.

Johnson cites Census data that shows Wisconsin has also slipped in teacher salaries. Ten years ago the state ranked 11th, but now places at 22nd.

More local governments look for ways to cooperate By Kristen Durst, Wisconsin Public Radio

As local governments brace for nearly a $60 million reduction in state aid in the proposed budget, some are looking to share more services. But the potential savings won't be enough to make up for those cuts.

Many Wisconsin municipalities already share certain services like fire protection, emergency communication, libraries, and law enforcement. Although for many cities, geography makes sharing impossible or not cost effective.

Dan Thompson, executive director of the League of Wisconsin Municipalities, says that local governments have spent years trying to provide services more economically, and that it's unlikely that there are big savings left to be found.

"I know folks want to believe that there is some simple way that city and village services could be provided a whole lot cheaper and we wouldn't have to choose between cutting services and raising taxes," says Thompson. "I'm afraid that hope is something of a phantom," Thompson said.

The cities of Beloit and Janesville will be holding some upcoming public meetings to discuss sharing additional services, like administration and animal control.

Larry Arft, Beloit's city manager, says he's hopeful the discussions may result in some savings, but that they wouldn't be nearly enough to cover the city's estimated $1.3 million deficit.

"We've done all of the things that you can do to trim out excess in a budget and we're down now to pretty hard core expenses," says Arft. "The rounds of cuts that we're looking at for 2012 are going to be painful. They will affect facilities, they'll affect employees, and they'll affect service levels."

Arft says Beloit's budget deficit could increase by another half a million dollars if the governor's collective bargaining law does not eventually go into effect. That law also requires most public workers to contribute more to their pension and health care costs.

Low water levels mean greater costs for Great Lakes ships By Mike Simonson, Wisconsin Public Radio

Low water levels in the Upper Great Lakes are keeping ships riding higher than usual. And less cargo means more trips and more expenses. Lakes Superior, Michigan and Huron are all down one inch from last year. That's not a lot except last year was also low. With Lake Superior down a foot from long-term averages and Lake Michigan down 15 inches, Lake Carriers Association vice president Glen Neckvasil says lakers are forced to carry smaller cargoes.

"We're light-loading something awful here," says Neckvasil. "We've got ships that back in 1997 were carrying 71,000 tons in a trip. Their first trip of this season they only had 59,000 on board. So between the dredging crisis and the low water levels, we're getting creamed."

Duluth-Superior Port Authority spokeswoman Adele Yorde says their port is busy this spring, but ships are having to light-load.

"Some of those huge lakers, those thousand footers that would load 68,000 to 70,000 tons, they're loading lighter. They have to be careful in some of the channels," Yorde said.

The Army Corp of Engineers says water levels should rise three to four inches in the next month on Lakes Superior and Michigan.

Ginseng growers face challenging future By Teresa Shipley, Wisconsin Public Radio

The Ginseng Board of Wisconsin warns that lean years are ahead for ginseng exports, despite a successful 2010. Last year, an early spring snowstorm and late summer rains combined to devastate much of Wisconsin's ginseng crop. Despite that double-whammy, ginseng export numbers jumped by almost 30 percent last year over 2009.

Butch Weege is the Director of International Marketing for the Ginseng Board of Wisconsin. He says when last year's disaster occurred -- in reference to the Mothers Day snowfall last May -- ginseng growers had enough roots in the ground that were harvestable come that fall.

But Weege says farmers won't have the same luck this year. He says the young crops that were one or two years old suffered substantially because they were either destroyed in total or their foliage was eliminated for the growing season.

"And the plants just went dormant. So we'll definitely be looking at reduced harvest volumes for the next two, possibly three years," Weege said.

Right now, about 95 percent of all U.S. ginseng exports come from Wisconsin. Weege says barring more extreme weather, he doesn't think Wisconsin will lose its market foothold.

Richland County burial mounds targeted for preservation By Maureen McCollum, Wisconsin Public Radio

Efforts are underway to preserve a group of burial mounds in southwest Wisconsin that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The Eagle Township Mound Group in Richland County was one of the largest burial mound groups in Wisconsin and could be up to 3,000 years old. There are 17 mounds remaining, all located on Ho-Chunk Nation land near Muscoda.

Ho-Chunk Nation aquatic biologist Randy Poelma says agricultural practices and erosion caused by the Wisconsin River are partially to blame for the wear.

"It seems like there's more and more flooding events and major storm events and what we're mostly worried about is catastrophic failure of this bank which would result in these mounds on the edge of the stream breaking off and actually going into the river and being lost forever," Poelma said.

Fast moving currents and sandy hillsides make it difficult to support the burial mounds. So the Army Corps of Engineers wants to fill areas with rock to reduce erosion. Army Corps project manager Nathan Wallerstedt says they're sensitive anytime they deal with cultural resources and hope to come up with a plan that protects the mounds as they are, from construction and erosion.

The Army Corps of Engineers is currently accepting public comments on the project's environmental assessment. They hope to start work on the project by fall.

Malaysia police slammed for cattle-branding women

Malaysia police slammed for cattle-branding women

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia -- Malaysian lawyers, politicians and activists lambasted the police Saturday, accusing them of abusing their power in chaining up and marking the bodies of 30 foreign women detained for alleged prostitution.

Police raided a high-end nightclub in northern Penang state late Thursday and arrested 29 women from China and one from Vietnam, along with eight Malaysian men. Local media reported police officers went undercover at the club for a week before the raid.

It triggered an outcry after local newspapers carried photos of the women bound up with a long chain and marked with either a tick or an X on their chest and forehead.

"The police branded the detained women as though they are cattle," opposition lawmaker Teresa Kok said in a statement. "It is sickening that the police would employ such dehumanizing tactics as a show of power and moral superiority over their detainees."

Women's rights group Tenaganita said the detainees had been victimized and called for an investigation into the police conduct.

Another rights group, Lawyers for Liberty, said the police action was "very unusual and inhumane" as the women were merely suspects and not convicted of any crime.

Police have defended their action, saying the markings served as a way to identify the women.

Penang police chief Ayub Yaakob told the New Straits Times that the situation was chaotic, with the suspects trying to escape. He said police were forced to mark the women after some donned new clothes to try and blend in with other female patrons of the club.

He also said the women had wrecked many marriages and that police had received numerous complaints from wives of men who sought their services.

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the flag icon below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. ( See our full terms of service here. )

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the flag icon to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the flag icon to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com . Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

Behind the board: How a flawed system jeopardizes patient safety - GreenwichTime

Behind the board: How a flawed system jeopardizes patient safety - GreenwichTime

It is supposed to be a bubble.

A place where a group of doctors and public citizens meet to decide the fate of physicians who have broken the law, committed medical errors or violated professional ethics codes.

Only the evidence that is placed before them -- often far less than is actually known -- is to be considered. Opinions about the decisions they render are not to influence them.

But outrage over several recent cases and increasing criticism of the "antiquated" way the Connecticut Medical Examining Board operates is threatening to burst the bubble.

For years, outside critics have lashed out at the board for being too lenient with doctors, allowing some physicians to keep their licenses after committing egregious violations.

Critics have been equally harsh toward the Department of Public Health's investigatory and legal staff, which looks into claims against doctors, hands often-truncated findings to the board and recommends resolutions.

Patient advocates say the board and DPH are failing to protect the public against the few bad apples who abuse their medical privileges.

Board members themselves -- past and present -- told Hearst Connecticut Newspapers they believe the system is flawed.

Both DPH and Gov. Dannel P. Malloy's office have pledged to look at the problems. But little has ever been done to fix the system. And with state government in budgetary crisis, many doubt it will ever change.

The Connecticut Medical Examining Board is comprised of doctors and a few members of the public who are appointed by the governor and serve as volunteers. The 15-member board is dependent on investigators and lawyers from the DPH to probe cases and work the legal process, leading to either a consent order -- the equivalent of a plea bargain -- or a full evidentiary hearing before the board.

The Connecticut model is becoming a rarity in the country. Most states have independent medical boards funded by a percentage of physician licensing fees. Connecticut took in $9 million in licensing fees in 2010, according to the DPH, but that money goes directly to the state's general fund. Currently, the medical board does not have a budget.

Fully-funded boards in other states conduct their own investigations, have their own lawyers and see cases through the entire process.

These autonomous boards are seen as the ideal model by many state and national organizations, including the Public Citizen Health Care Research Group.

Each year, the Public Citizen group ranks each state's board by taking disciplinary data -- including license revocations, surrenders, suspensions and probations issued -- from the Federation of State Medical Boards and calculating the rate of serious actions per 1,000 physicians for each state. For the past 10 years, the Connecticut Medical Examining Board has ranked among the worst in the nation.

From 2003 to 2005, the board ranked 38th of the 50 states. In 2006, the board dropped to 42nd, falling further to 45th in 2007 and 47th in 2008 and 2009, according to the report. Top-ranking states have rates of about 6 percent to 7 percent of serious actions per 1,000 physicians. Connecticut's rate has hovered under 2 percent over the past few years, according to the study.

Although board members and officials from the DPH have disputed the data, arguing the study does not take into account alternate sanctions like fines and reprimands, patient advocates believe the rankings are alarming.

"We have been ranking so low in terms of the effectiveness of our medical board," said Jean Rexford, executive director of the Connecticut Center for Patient Safety. "Rather than having somebody say, `Let's take a look at this and re-examine how we are doing business,' they seem to be pressing forward, doing the same thing and expecting better results."

The Connecticut State Medical Society, a group that represents doctors, agrees that certain changes could be beneficial to all parties.

"CSMS believes the creation of a self-sustainable, diverse, transparent and effective independent board would serve the best interest of Connecticut residents and physicians," medical society spokeswoman Audrey Honig Geragosian said.

Geragosian said members of the medical society believe giving the board full autonomy and funding are necessary for cases to have "thorough and complete review, providing accused physicians with due process while protecting Connecticut patients."

DPH statistics on the number of complaints filed against doctors and the number of actions taken support criticisms by patient advocates that the board is too lenient.

Between 2007 and 2009, the DPH says it received between 300 and 400 complaints per year. Those complaints stem from patients, or notification by state or federal agencies that a possible violation has occurred.

Of those investigations, only 29 physicians received disciplinary actions in 2007, 37 in 2008 and 55 in 2009. Only three doctors had their licenses revoked between 2007 and 2009. Seven doctors had their licenses suspended. Eleven doctors voluntarily surrendered their licences and 39 received monetary fines, according to the statistics.

Dr. Dennis G. O'Neill, a former medical board chairman and practicing pathologist, said the crux of the problem with the physician-disciplinary process is a system disconnect in which the DPH investigates a complaint against a doctor, and the board adjudicates it. In this system, board members often do not have access to much of the investigatory information before coming to a decision on a case.

"I think it is an antiquated model," said O'Neill, who retired from the board in 2008 after 12 years. "They (the DPH) just don't have the resources to police doctors as well as they probably should be monitoring them."

O'Neill said he believes nearly all board members would prefer to serve in an autonomous model.

"The board occasionally feels frustrated with the constraints of the process," O'Neill said. "We don't always get all the information that DPH may have in its investigation. ... I think, in general, the members of the board found that it was a less optimal situation when we didn't have control over the investigators."

That problem was evident during a May 17 board meeting in Hartford when a DPH lawyer presented members with a proposed consent order, but was unable to answer any questions they had about the case, which involved a doctor who was allegedly letting his assistants run the X-ray machine.

"I am reluctant to give a lot of details because of the respondent's due process rights," DPH staff attorney David Tilles told the board.

"This puts us in a very difficult situation," board member Dr. Douglas Fellows said. "If you can't give us the information, we can't do anything but sit here."

The board ultimately ended up rejecting the consent order, despite Tilles recommending they accept it.

Rexford said the back-door lawyering that surrounds the consent orders is a very troubling aspect of the process.

"The DPH loves to cross an investigation off their list, and that's a problem," Rexford said. "You might not get what the public needs if you have a consent decree."

The only way the board gets access to all the evidence in a case is when a full hearing takes place, and a panel of several board members recommends a disciplinary action, called a memorandum of decision, that is then voted on by the full board. Doctors can also voluntarily surrender their license, or board members can order an emergency suspension.

Statistics from the DPH show the majority of cases before the board are resolved through consent orders. In 2008, there were 26 consent orders and six memorandums of decision. In 2009, there were 33 consent orders and three memorandums of decision. In 2010, there were 17 consent orders and seven memorandums of decision. So far this year, there have been eight consent orders and one memorandum of decision, according to the data.

Dr. Henry Jacobs, a current member of the board and practicing OB-GYN, said the board deals with consent orders frequently, and the process worries him.

"I think the model is flawed," Jacobs said. "Sometimes cases are three or four years old, and then they (DPH lawyers) bring them to us, and we have a consent order."

"We never really had access to the case and they've cut a deal with the lawyer for the respondent and present it to us to give it our blessing. We don't necessarily agree with it, but we are pressured to go with the flow."

While Jacobs said he believes the lawyers and investigators for the DPH try hard, they are ultimately too underfunded to be effective.

"More cases get settled with consent orders, and then we get criticized for something we really had little to say about," Jacobs said.

Funding is also an issue, both O'Neill and Jacobs said, as investigators are handling many cases at a time, and the experts used to review cases are working for free.

"It has always been a chronic problem that the DPH didn't have the financial wherewithal to bring in doctor's experts," O'Neill said.

"You get what you pay for," Jacobs added.

Despite the criticism launched by both current and former members of the board, Anne Doremus, the current chairwoman of the medical examining board, said she feels the public is being adequately protected.

"We have faith that the DPH is not trying to expedite the process," Doremus said of consent orders. "They are doing a thorough job. They are as concerned for what is at stake as the board is."

Doremus also said she found the DPH experts who consult on cases "credible" because they are volunteering their time to be part of an important process. In the end, Doremus said members have the final say.

"We do have the final decision," Doremus said. "If the board doesn't feel something isn't right we don't accept the consent order."

Doremus said every type of board model has problems, but despite her defense of the board she chairs, Doremus agreed an independent model would be superior to the current one.

"From my perspective, the board would be much more comfortable if the investigatory material for the respondent was sent to the board and we collectively looked at the evidence," Doremus said. "That's what happens in other states."

As the number of discussions surrounding the effectiveness of the board grows, state officials seem to be getting the message.

William Gerrish, spokesman for the DPH, said in a statement last week that the DPH and the governor's office are going to take a look at the issue.

"Protecting and promoting the health and safety of Connecticut residents is the top priority for the Department of Public Health and Governor Malloy," Gerrish said. "We are aware of concerns about the configuration of the Medical Examining Board, and looking at the board and its relationship to the department is one of Commissioner (Jewel) Mullen's top priorities. To that end, DPH will work with the Governor's Office to review those respective and complimentary roles of the department and medical board to ensure that the most effective actions are taken to protect the public from physicians who pose a threat to their patients."

Former state Sen. Andrew McDonald, now the general counsel to Malloy, said the governor's administration is open to proposals for a new approach.

"If there are proposals made by the board or other interested stakeholders about how to improve the operation of the board, the administration would be happy to consider those recommended procedures," McDonald said.

McDonald said the governor has made recent nominations to the board "in an effort to reconstitute some of its membership." However, any significant change would have to come through the legislative process, he said.

"The governor doesn't control the board or its operations," McDonald said. "They are independent."

Even with the acknowledgement that things do need to change, many are still skeptical anything will get done.

"The answer we always get is budget, budget, budget," said Jacobs, describing conversations he had with DPH officials about the issue.

"There is some self interest in these things, too. DPH jobs depend on having an investigative division. They are pretty well settled into those jobs and don't want an independent medical board with its own set of investigative nurses and lawyers."

Lawmakers also said now is not the time to talk about reforming the system because bills are not getting passed with large fiscal notes attached.

"I think a lot of people are concerned about the model that we have and are interested in looking at better models," said state Rep. Betsey Ritter, D-36th District, who chairs the Public Health Committee. "But so far, that has been stymied by the fiscal part."

Despite budgetary stumbling blocks, Ritter said lawmakers are preparing the groundwork to have a viable model for reform ready to go when "the time is right." Such reforms are unlikely to pass in a single legislative session, but Malloy's appointment last year of Commissioner Mullen -- a former director in the Massachusetts Bureau of Community Health -- may present a greater opening for change, she said.

"We have an opportunity now," Ritter said. "We have a new administration, and we have a new commissioner over at the Department of Public Health that has seen other models work."

Currently, there are a few bills in the mix that seek to change the board. One bill, sponsored by the DPH, would make it easier for the board to immediately sanction doctors with out-of-state violations. Gerrish said the department is also looking at requiring doctors convicted of sex offenses to disclose their status to patients.

Another bill, sponsored by state Rep. Andy Fleischmann, D-18th District, seeks to expedite the disciplinary process and add patient advocates and a criminal attorney to the board.

"It seems to me the public is best protected when there are a lot of different parties who are paying attention," Fleischmann said. "It is a tougher sell right now, but long term, I am optimistic we can get all of the reforms in place."

Doremus said making simple changes to the verbiage of state statutes governing the board to give them more freedom would go a long way.

"We are constrained, as is DPH, by statute," Doremus said. "We can work together to get that changed, and that wouldn't cost any money."

But Rexford said money should not stop officials from putting their heads together to try and troubleshoot the issues in order to protect the public.

"They could easily have a meeting, bring in some public consumers, people on the medical board, Representative Ritter, the Governor's Office, and sit down and say, `How can we do this better?' " Rexford said. "But we are in the land of steady habits, and I think DPH wants to keep control."

O'Neill agreed it would be a good idea to figure out a way to implement changes he said he believes all board members would welcome. But after serving on the board for more than a decade, O'Neill said he doubted those reforms will happen.

"Well, realistically, I don't think it is ever going to change," O'Neill said. "It is a financial issue. The only thing that will get it to change is an outrageous scandal that embarrasses everybody and that makes it evident to everyone from DPH to the medical community to the public that we have to get more aggressive with doctors.

"And the only way to do that is with a different medical board model."

Lawyers get wake-up call - Local News - News - General - The Canberra Times

Lawyers get wake-up call - Local News - News - General - The Canberra Times

ACT ATTORNEY-GENERAL Simon Corbell is considering appointing a legal services commissioner to investigate allegations of professional misconduct by members of the local legal community.

A spokeswoman for the Justice and Community Safety Directorate said that, while the current regulatory system had served the ACT well, Mr Corbell was seeking to identify potential improvements.

A wide range of possible options needed to be carefully considered, including whether to adopt a proposed national regulatory scheme.

Mr Corbell's office was responding to questions from the Sunday Canberra Times following a Consumer Voice report two weeks ago in which the Law Society of the ACT dismissed a complaint against a solicitor who had charged $1650 to make a minor change to a Hackett couple's will.

The society's professional standards director, Robert Reis, said its complaints committee had dismissed the complaint for lack of substance.

A Canberra lawyer, who asked not to be identified, said it constituted gross overcharging and should have been found by the society to be professional misconduct. Generally, lawyers charge about $200 to draft a will.

The society's president, Athol Opas, said it had concluded the charging was not so excessive that it could be categorised as unprofessional.

Mr Opas would not comment on what he would expect to pay to have a will prepared, but said charges would need to be reasonable for the time spent.

''It seems to me the Law Society has undertaken a careful investigation into the complaint.''

He did not agree the ACT needed a legal services commissioner as exists in other jurisdictions to investigate complaints about lawyers.

He said the society did a very professional job with complaint handling and had a vested interest in upholding high standards.

''I am strongly confident the Law Society performs its role as regulator to a very high standard without cost to ACT ratepayers,'' Mr Opas said.

A legal services commissioner would be another cost to the ACT budget.

''Given the small size of our jurisdiction, the Law Society performs a professional job and upholds very high standards.''

He said, this was done without fear or favour.

''Quite often those complaints are without merit,'' Mr Opas said.

Mr Opas said lawyers were a natural target for people wanting to make complaints when things did not work out as they had hoped.

Civilian deputy who shot gun on school grounds fired for misusing agency databases

Civilian deputy who shot gun on school grounds fired for misusing agency databases

A civilian deputy on probation for firing a gun while impaired after a night of kissing has been terminated for using criminal and driver license databases to look up deputies, their spouses, Hollywood stars, musicians and professional athletes.

The Collier County Sheriff’s Office terminated Monica Weiben, 40, on Feb. 28 for inappropriately using the Florida Criminal Information Center, the National Crime Information Center and the Driver and Vehicle Information Database (D.A.V.I.D.) nearly 300 times. Last month, the Sheriff’s Office challenged her claim for unemployment benefits, citing several violations of agency policies; a possible denial is pending.

Weiben declined comment this week, saying only, “I just want to move on.”

Sheriff’s Spokeswoman Karie Partington said D.A.V.I.D. is a database that is to be used for law enforcement purposes only.

“This fact is made abundantly clear to anyone authorized to access the system,” Partington added.

The audit showed she checked her own and other deputies’ information 47 times, conducted 64 checks of professional athletes, musicians and celebrities between August 2006 and December 2008, prompting a later audit up to last September that turned up more violations.

Weiben had been on paid suspension since Dec. 15 and later lost her $29,633.76 yearly job after nearly five years. Her post was going to be eliminated after a productivity audit showed she did far less work than two other civilian deputies, who could take over her workload.

She was cited earlier for failing to follow directions and coming in late, but received the final warning in January, when she was disciplined for the Aug. 27 incident at another deputy’s mobile home on the grounds of The Community School of Naples. She was suspended without pay for two days and put on a year of probation.

The investigation by the sheriff’s Professional Responsibility Bureau into what occurred between her and Cpl. Robert M. Leocadio, 42, a SWAT team member, determined she’d been drinking before she picked up Leocadio’s gun and said she accidentally fired it that night, when they were off duty.

For that, PRB investigators cited her for performing acts that “tend to bring the (Sheriff’s Office) into disrepute or ridicule,” and immoral, unlawful or improper conduct. Investigators noted a Daily News story on the incident prompted more than 145 blog comments.

The website for the Glock 19C Pistol, which is designed to reduce recoil, shows it has a “Safe Action” trigger system to prevent unintentional firing.

The Sheriff’s Office had requested a warrant for Weiben’s arrest on a charge of use of a firearm under the influence of alcoholic beverages, a second-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in county jail. However, the State Attorney’s Office determined the facts didn’t support criminal charges that could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

PRB documents provide this account:

At about 9:30 p.m. Aug. 27, Leocadio contacted a sergeant to report an accidental discharge of his gun. Deputies went to the double-wide trailer on school grounds, where a youth relations deputy had allowed Weiben to stay after a breakup. The deputy was away on a one-day cruise.

Deputies noted Leocadio was upset and embarrassed, while “it was obvious that Deputy Weiben was intoxicated and she was very upset” and “rambling.” She said she’d had at least two Smirnoff Malt beverages with a shot of vodka, but it affected her more because she hadn’t eaten.

Leocadio came over about 7:30 p.m. and they were “getting intimate” on the couch, so he took his gun from his holster and put it on a table next to them. When he went to the bathroom, she said she picked it up to move it farther away from her, but gripped it and accidentally pulled the trigger.

She told deputies it scared her, she’d never fired a weapon before, and shooting it wasn’t her intention. The shot prompted Leocadio to come out of the bathroom, upset she’d fired it.

He immediately reported the discharge.

She denied fighting with him, intentionally firing or trying to scare him, saying it was an accident. She told the Daily News she’s anemic, was dizzy and pulled it by mistake.

Leocadio, who was estranged from his wife, told deputies they’d been on the couch “kissing and stuff” and they weren’t dating, but were together twice before.

He said he came out of the bathroom, the gun was in her hand, she had a “look of disbelief on her face” and told him, “I didn’t realize it was loaded.”

The bullet pierced an area rug and was embedded in the wood floor. Deputies determined the angle was consistent with her account.

Leocadio, who was hired in March 1998 and earns $60,768.24 yearly, was cited for violating safety rules or practices. A letter of reprimand was placed in his personnel file and he was relieved of training instructing duties until he received firearms safety training.

His file shows various letters of praise from citizens and agency awards and certificates.

Nedda Alammar: Destination: Baghdad?

Nedda Alammar: Destination: Baghdad?

Before he went crazy and thought he was a descendant of the Prophet Muhammad, Saddam Hussein did some pretty okay things; minus the murdering people, minus the bloodshed, minus robbing people of their families. In Iraq, education was free. Health care was free. People could study abroad if they wanted to, all expenses paid. Every citizen was guaranteed a paying job. Back in the seventies, before the wars and all that sh-t, as my mother says, Iraq was a great place to live. Minus the fear of saying the wrong thing and dying an untimely death.

The other day, my mother called me in hysterics. "Our land! Baghdad! A--hole!" She usually greets me with "Where are you? Are you dead?" If I fail to answer her calls immediately, I've been raped and murdered by an old boyfriend who dumped me in an incinerator so as to cover his tracks. She watches a lot of Lifetime and Investigation Discovery.

"Your what?" I said. "Our land!" she said. "Someone tried to steal our land!" My parents left Iraq thirty years ago, and apparently, from what I learned in this conversation, still own a plot of land there, courtesy of Saddam Hussein. Apparently he had given everyone who had a PhD from abroad a plot of land at a discount. My mother loves discounts.

I went to an Ivy League school and all I got was a fat bill from Sallie Mae.

I'd never heard about this plot of land, so my first thought was Vacation Place. After all, our family has only timeshare in Cape Cod -- I mean how many times can a person visit the potato chip factory? Or play mini golf? After a minute of fantasizing, I realized that 1.) Summer vay-cay in Baghdad is not a viable possibility and 2.) This land was just one more thing my mother forgot she had bought. Why was she so upset? She has so much crap, as my father says, crap that she doesn't even need. But then I realized something. When you almost lose something you forgot you even had, you are allowed to be upset. Especially if it's a piece of your homeland.

I told my mother to relax, that it was by the fate of God -- not that I'm religious but such bold statements usually work in times of high anxiety -- that she found out this news. It was fate that her sister, who still lives in Baghdad, was looking to claim her husband's inheritance, fate that her lawyer knew of my parents' land and said it was almost sold but that the seller could not provide the proper identification. Between me and me, I was shocked that after all this time the land was still there, fully in tact. Doesn't it have like a residual tank or something just sitting on it?

But no, the land was still there. Ready to be sold. "This a--hole was a PhD just like us! That's how he faked everything!" Recently my parents told me to get a PhD. Shoot for the stars, they said. I gloated about this sudden shift in all they thought was right with the world and asked her how much this PhD jerk was going to get for the land. "Almost a quarter of a million dollars," she said.

Wow. Maybe I should get a PhD.

I told her to get herself on the next plane to Baghdad. She agreed -- she wants to find the PhD a--hole and ring his neck. But her mother, who also still lives there, refuses to allow her to come. She'll take care of it. She doesn't want my mother to come to Baghdad. Surely she will die.

I've heard that any war has lots of casualties. But who knew that the life you never had could be one of them?

My parents often say Iraq is gone. Just gone. And while they do not say this with such sadness -- they are amidst trying to get the rest of our family out of Baghdad and into our home in New Jersey. I don't know which is worse, honestly -- I see what they mean. And it's not the tear-jerking 'take me back to my homeland, this is where I belong' schtick. After all, my father is soft-spoken and docile and my mother wears mini-skirts and buys me wine. They are not exactly typical Arabs.

For my parents, Iraq was on its way to being gone long before its war with America. For me, it's a shame its leader had to be so crazy, and that our leader had to be so crazy too. And while we may never go back to Iraq, at least we know part of us is still there.

Unless someone who thinks he's really smart tries to steal it again.

Follow Nedda Alammar on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@neddaalammar

The Money Behind John Edwards: Heiress Rachel ‘Bunny’ Mellon, Age 100 - Clare O'Connor - Filthy Rich - Forbes

The Money Behind John Edwards: Heiress Rachel ‘Bunny’ Mellon, Age 100 - Clare O'Connor - Filthy Rich - Forbes

Rachel 'Bunny' Mellon.

One of the most telling details in today’s indictment of two-time presidential candidate John Edwards comes in the form of a note from a supporter, sent to former aide Andrew Young in 2007. The donor is described in the indictment as ‘Person C’, but is widely understood to be reclusive banking heiress Rachel Mellon, or ‘Bunny’ to her friends. In the note, Mellon, aged 96 at the time, defends Edwards from media ribbing (he’d just spent $400 on a haircut) — and appears to provide evidence that led to today’s indictment for receiving illegal campaign contributions:

“I was sitting alone in a grim mood – furious that the press attacked Senator Edwards on the price of a haircut. But it inspired me – from now on, all haircuts, etc., that are necessary and important for his campaign – please send the bills to me….It is a way to help our friend without government restrictions.”

Mellon did indeed help Edwards, according to the indictment, writing $725,000 in personal checks for items like ‘chairs’, ‘bookcase’, and ‘antique Charleston table’ that instead went to support Rielle Hunter, who had a child with Edwards. In his book on the Edwards saga, Andrew Young says Mellon hid her checks in boxes of chocolate, and claims they were intended as gifts, therefore not subject to campaign finance laws. Mellon’s New York-based lawyer Alexander Forger, who was unavailable for comment today, has said in the past that the heiress had no idea her money was going to Hunter.

Now aged 100 and in increasingly frail health, Mellon is likely to be called to testify. “There’s no question that she is involved, so her testimony would be highly relevant,” said Gerald Lefcourt, a criminal defense lawyer with a roster of high-profile clients including politicians. “There are numerous ways of proving the money came from her.”

If Mellon takes the stand, it’ll be one of the very few times she’s emerged from self-imposed seclusion in years. Her husband Paul Mellon, scion of the banking family, died in 1999. While she inherited some of his estate, worth $1.4 billion per the 1998 Forbes 400 rich list, he left much of it to charitable causes. But Bunny Mellon is rich in her own right, not just by marriage: her father Gerard Lambert was the one-time president of Gillette and made a fortune through his Warner-Lambert pharmaceutical company, inventors of the mouthwash Listerine. Pfizer bought out Warner-Lambert for $110 billion in 2000; it is unclear what, if any, stake Bunny Mellon had in the company at that point.

Forbes has been unable to put any sort of definitive number on Mellon’s net worth, although we’re trying ahead of this year’s Forbes 400 list (she’d be America’s oldest billionaire). It appears much of her fortune is tied up in trusts, and unsurprisingly no-one in her circle is keen to divulge much information. What is clear is that she is both extraordinarily wealthy and very private. According to a rare profile in Vanity Fair — her second interview in over 40 years — she maintains homes in Antigua, Paris, New York, Washington, Nantucket, and Cape Cod (they’re said to be fully staffed at all times). Her main residence is a 4,000-acre farm in Virginia with its own airstrip for her Falcon 2000. Mellon’s art collection includes Giacomettis and a Rothko worth $125 million, says VF.

Aside from her wealth and pedigree, Bunny Mellon has led a colorful life, which James Reginato does an excellent job detailing in VF. She was a close friend of Jacqueline Kennedy, taking the young president’s wife under her wing and helping design the White House rose garden. She was renowned as a horticulturalist, but also as a fashion plate. As Reginato writes, Givenchy designed her entire wardrobe, down to her underwear and her servants’ uniforms. She was a socialite and a trendsetter; she learned pilates from — who else — Joseph Pilates. And she took an interest in liberal politics. She wanted to help elect John Edwards because she thought a Democrat in the White House would “save the world.”

Read the full John Edwards indictment document here. He entered a not guilty plea on Friday afternoon. I’ll be following the Edwards case and Bunny Mellon’s involvement. Check back and follow me on Twitter – @Clare_OC.